Most Convincing Photo of the Loch Ness Monster Yet?

I have said in the past, numerous times, that I don’t believe in the Loch Ness Monster. At least, I don’t believe that the things people are seeing that make up the legend of Nessie are necessarily caused by a prehistoric plesiosaur that has survived into modern times. But people are seeing something, so obviously there is an impetus for the sightings. Now, aquatic dinosaur is probably the least likely, but I could buy a giant eel, giant sturgeon, groups of seals, or other more mundane explanations. But every few months, someone takes a photo of a mysterious “something” in the Loch, and the internets goes wild. Here is the totally convincing/completely unconvincing photo of the month.

Loch Ness Monster by Ian Bremner
Photographic proof of Nessie? Or just seals romping and frolicking?

A whisky warehouse worker has taken a picture of what could be one of the most convincing Loch Ness Monster sightings to date.

Amateur photographer Ian Bremner, 58, was driving around the Highlands in search of red deer – but stumbled instead across the remarkable sight of what appears to be Nessie swimming in the calm waters of Loch Ness.

The dad-of-four spends most of his weekends in the region taking photographs of the stunning natural beauty.

But it was not until he got back to his home in Nigg, Invergordon, that he noticed three humps emerging from the water which he thinks could be the elusive monster.

The picture shows a two-metre long silver creature swimming away from the lens with its head bobbing away and a tail flapping a metre away, preparing to swim further on.

The apparent creature was spotted coming up for air close to the banks of the loch on Saturday afternoon midway between the villages of Dores and Inverfarigaig.

Ian said: “It’s a part of the world that always makes you second guess what you’re seeing.

“When you’re up there you’re constantly looking in the water to see if you can spot anything in there.

“This is the first time I’ve ever seen Nessie in the loch. I would be amazing if I was the first one to find her.

“I’m normally a bit of a sceptic when it comes to Nessie and I think it’s just something for the tourists but I’m starting to think there is something out there.

“When I saw it on my screen I said ‘what the hell is that?’

“If you’re fishing there it’s the sort of place where you can get a tingle up your spine and second guess what you’re seeing.

“You start seeing things even when you know fine there’s nothing there.”

Ian’s picture fits in perfectly with the widely believed description of Nessie being a long serpent creature which stretches as far back as 1933.

The image he took closely resembles some of the clearest and most notable examples of the creature.

Encounters from 1933 tell of a 10ft long limbless creature crossing the road leaving behind a slimy trail of undergrowth.

And in 2001 a pair of fishermen spotted a dark 6ft long blob sticking its head out of the water and were adamant that it was not a seal.

There have been five other reported sightings of the monster this year which, including Ian’s latest, is the highest number since 2002.

Some of Ian’s friends think his picture actually shows three seals playing in the water. Ian said: “I suppose it could be seals – but I’m not so sure.

The more I think about it, the more I think it could be Nessie.” Over the years there have been 1081 recorded sightings of the Loch Ness Monster lurking in the water.

The monster and the tourists who come to look for it are thought to be worth around £30m to the Highland economy.

My guess is that this is known animals, or just a Photoshopped picture. I’m not sure why, but this photo looks a bit fake to me. There’s just something about it that seems “wrong,” though I can’t quite put my finger on it. The splashes look a little off? The focus doesn’t seem entirely natural? Don’t know what it is but is seems a little odd to me. What do you think?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

One thought on “Most Convincing Photo of the Loch Ness Monster Yet?

  1. I really want this to be real, but…I’m waiting for it to be proven false. Or at least explainable. Because that’s what happens, right? I’m mostly dismayed that the man either didn’t have, or didn’t think, to put his camera to video mode. Video plus a photo? More believable. Not to mention more evidence to study.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *